|
Both products are used to add a LonWorks interface to a host processor. The FTXL solution supports a series of FPGA-based host processors from Altera, where the ShortStack solution supports any host processor with sufficient resources. The ShortStack product requires fewer resources on your host processor in terms of program memory and RAM. The two products use very similar versions of the LonTalk API, providing familiar interfaces for developers who require both solutions in their product lines. The ShortStack Micro Server supports up to 254 network variables on the host, while the FTXL solution supports up to 4096 network variables. The FTXL solution also has a higher performance LonTalk protocol stack since much of the protocol is implemented on the 32-bit host.
more
|
What are the key differences between Echelon's ShortStack and FTXL products?
Related Questions
- All of these products can be used to add a LonWorks interface to any host processor. With the exception of PC ...
- The complexity of the port depends on the host processor, but a typical porting time including custom driver ...
- No, the LNS network operating system combined with an LNS network interface such as the U10 or U20 USB ...
- Yes, for home applications you can use a LonBridge server with a custom network interface that you build that ...
- It communicates with your host processor using either a Serial Communications Interface (SCI) or a Serial ...